Is There a Cancer Microbe?
During the 1960s, Alan Cantwell, Jr., M.D., considered himself "just a regular dermatologist" trying to understand what caused scleroderma, a condition in which the skin hardens and thickens for no known reason-or so dermatologists thought.

In the course of his laboratory work, Dr. Cantwell independently discovered mysterious but highly prevalent bacteria found in tissue samples from patients with scleroderma. It seemed evident to him that this bacteria caused the skin problem.

Around 1965, Dr. Cantwell met Virginia Livingston, M.D., and when they shared notes, it seemed they were both tracking the same microbe.

In fact, this microbe, which Dr. Livingston labelled P. cryptocides, was found in increased numbers in patients with cancer, scleroderma, lupus, and sarcoidosis. "Virginia was labelled a crazy scientist because she saw cancer bacteria that cancer experts would not see," notes Dr. Cantwell in his book The Cancer Microbe (1990).

 

First, the microbiologists were outraged that an outsider presumed to create a new label for a microbe. Second, they didn't believe a cancer microbe existed in the first place, Dr. Cantwell says. "After 20 years of hunting microbes in skin diseases, I knew the old established 'rules' of microbiology were not workable".

The oncologists closed ranks and ridiculed Dr. Livingston's work. For good reason, from their point of view, Dr. Cantwell adds. If cancer is caused by bacteria, and chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation have no effect against it, the whole edifice of conventional cancer treatment would have to be dismantled. "All the standard treatments for cancer would have to be reevaluated in terms of this microbe. We're talking about big changes here".

Despite the laboratory work, the photos of P. cryptocides from live blood, the scientific papers and books, Dr. Livingston's cancer microbe remains "the most closeted scientific achievement of our century," Dr. Cantwell contends.

 

Her findings today mean nothing to conventional oncologists.  Her discoveries don't exist. How can they credit bacteria seen in living blood when they consider blood to be sterile?"

Dr. Cantwell admits that it might have been premature for Dr. Livingston to concoct a new name for the cancer microbe. He contends that microbiologists might identify some of the cancer microbe cultures as Staphylococcus epidermidis, which is found commonly on skin. Dr. Cantwell is also concerned that, insofar as P. cryptocides goes through many form changes, "if you vaccinate against one form of it, suppose another form starts to take over?"

The most important issue, he says, is that Dr. Livingston has made people aware that this germ exists. "That has been my life's work, too, just telling people to look at it. You can see it and grow it, so why don't we study this further?"

Ruth Bever, Information Services

Darkfield Microscope View1

(1)Livingston Center's Ruth Bever examines a patient's live blood with a darkfield microscope. (2) A tissue section of breast cancer, specially stained (acidfast) to detect the microbe, shows two areas of round (coccoidal) forms, stained purple. The tissue is magnified 1,000X. (3) According to Alan Cantwell, Jr., M.D., Staphyloccocus epidermidis may be the same microbe (at least at one stage) as the ever-changing P. cryptocides. Shown here, S. epidermidis is magnified 1000X and was cultured from the breast cancer (the same patient as in photo 2) which had spread to the skin. Note the similar size and shape of these microbes to those in the original breast cancer tumor from photo 2. Is this the cancer microbe caught in the act?

Darkfield Microscope View 2

    Next Page    

Alternative Medicine Digest - Issue 19